Healthy eating has had a sizable enemy for quite some time, according to a variety of news sources and public advocacy groups. It's called High Fructose Corn Syrup (HFCS). The onslaught against it has been so great that its producers have been attempting to rebrand it, corn sugar, in an attempt to avoid the bad reputation and increase profitability. Researchers at Princeton University released a paper indicating that Americans consume about sixty pounds per year, per person, of HFCS. They also highlight the concurrent rise in usage of HFCS and the rise in obesity rates. I have studied a wide variety of research from both sides of the argument. I will attempt to answer the question, is HFCS worse than sugar?
HFCS can be found in a wide range of foods and drinks, ranging from soft drinks to salad dressings and other sauces, as well as breads and cereals. It is commonly partnered with other unhealthy ingredients and chemicals, such as sodium and saturated fat. Despite significant research suggesting the unhealthiness of HFCS, the FDA allows its usage in almost anything.
HFCS does not differ significantly from sucrose (table sugar) from a chemical standpoint. It has about 5% more fructose and 5% less glucose. It's sweetness level is about the same as honey, while its glycemic index is a fair amount higher than table sugar (75 vs. 60). In order to make HFCS, it must undergo significant processing as all of the fructose contained within the syrup is artificially added. Fructose does not naturally occur in corn starch.
In a study completed three years ago, researchers gave subjects a diet that provided 25% of daily energy needs in sweetened beverages. There were three groups: glucose; fructose, and HFCS. Those volunteers in the latter two groups had notable increases in bad cholesterol in just two weeks while the control group, those receiving glucose, saw no negative changes.
Although we digest sucrose and High Fructose Corn Syrup differently, there are no substantial differences in blood sugar readings. However, because of the processed-nature of HFCS, it appears as if there is a larger negative impact on the liver, which causes higher rates of diabetes. The fructose in HFCS is added as part of the processing, so it doesn't have to be separated in the body, meaning it heads directly to the liver, which can cause something called a fatty liver, which is a driver of diabetes. HFCS also doesn't appear to trigger insulin, so it can lead to overeating. Insulin alerts your body that it is full.
Based on existing research, HFCS looks to be more dangerous than sucrose by a fair amount. That being said, sugar is still dangerous. Added sugar should be avoided or used in very small amounts. It still carries significant risk of diabetes, heart complications, and significant weight gain, which creates a host of additional issues.
It is important not to take this research and condemn all sugars. Some people avoid fruit, because sugar carries such a bad rap. Research indicates that naturally-occurring sugars are digested differently than unnaturally-added sugar. Fruits and vegetables are an important part of a healthy diet. It is added sugar that needs to be avoided.
HFCS can be found in a wide range of foods and drinks, ranging from soft drinks to salad dressings and other sauces, as well as breads and cereals. It is commonly partnered with other unhealthy ingredients and chemicals, such as sodium and saturated fat. Despite significant research suggesting the unhealthiness of HFCS, the FDA allows its usage in almost anything.
HFCS does not differ significantly from sucrose (table sugar) from a chemical standpoint. It has about 5% more fructose and 5% less glucose. It's sweetness level is about the same as honey, while its glycemic index is a fair amount higher than table sugar (75 vs. 60). In order to make HFCS, it must undergo significant processing as all of the fructose contained within the syrup is artificially added. Fructose does not naturally occur in corn starch.
In a study completed three years ago, researchers gave subjects a diet that provided 25% of daily energy needs in sweetened beverages. There were three groups: glucose; fructose, and HFCS. Those volunteers in the latter two groups had notable increases in bad cholesterol in just two weeks while the control group, those receiving glucose, saw no negative changes.
Although we digest sucrose and High Fructose Corn Syrup differently, there are no substantial differences in blood sugar readings. However, because of the processed-nature of HFCS, it appears as if there is a larger negative impact on the liver, which causes higher rates of diabetes. The fructose in HFCS is added as part of the processing, so it doesn't have to be separated in the body, meaning it heads directly to the liver, which can cause something called a fatty liver, which is a driver of diabetes. HFCS also doesn't appear to trigger insulin, so it can lead to overeating. Insulin alerts your body that it is full.
Based on existing research, HFCS looks to be more dangerous than sucrose by a fair amount. That being said, sugar is still dangerous. Added sugar should be avoided or used in very small amounts. It still carries significant risk of diabetes, heart complications, and significant weight gain, which creates a host of additional issues.
It is important not to take this research and condemn all sugars. Some people avoid fruit, because sugar carries such a bad rap. Research indicates that naturally-occurring sugars are digested differently than unnaturally-added sugar. Fruits and vegetables are an important part of a healthy diet. It is added sugar that needs to be avoided.
About the Author:
Please see my website for additional information at why are processed foods bad or my blog at why artificial sweeteners are bad
0 comments:
Post a Comment